Clinical Clarity
Lead with business needs. Let the tech follow.
Clinical Clarity
Lead with business needs. Let the tech follow.
The problem
The sponsor knew their current approach to RBQM wasn’t sustainable.
The team was buried in the mechanics—preparing data, loading files, managing signals—but had no time to focus on what the results meant or how to act on them. The analysis was getting done, but the thinking behind it wasn’t.
They had two options: treat it like a typical IT project and bring in consultants to write requirements and code, or take a different approach. One that started with the business context, not just the technology.
What we did
They chose to lead with clinical subject matter expertise.
- The project was shaped by SMEs who understood the realities of RBQM and data-driven data review.
- A solution architect joined early to explore new technologies, not just implement old ones
- Together, the SME and technical team mapped the real goals, explored the options, and designed a solution that was built to support how the team actually wanted to work.
- The result was a validated, faster, and more affordable approach that delivered meaningful improvements—not just a system replacement
This wasn’t a lift and shift. It was a redesign, grounded in the needs of RBQM teams who work with complex trial data every day.
Who this helps
- Sponsors modernizing RBQM or clinical data review
- Teams doing the work but missing time for context and interpretation
- Organizations tired of treating transformation as a checklist exercise
If you're ready to build something that actually fits how your teams work, we can help—starting with clarity.
The result
- Delivered in less than half the time
- Completed with under one-third of the original budget
- Included more functionality than the legacy process it replaced
And for the first time, the team had the space to interpret what the data was showing—not just process it.
